GÜVENPARK, KIZILAY, ANKARA

Different designs for people ,who have different abilities, with a variety of different places is not considered. Music activities can be defined for the small areas where a small performance. In addition, a playground area for children has been quite limited. For other activities, a very weak definition of private space designs
- Park design and the use of function is not reflected by the designer to the user. Recent changes very different topography and space limits, complicated the perceive of user to design.
- Topography Levels which are organized as very scattered, causing the user to feel uncomfortable while walking or roaming.
- In the process of park design did not thought to how much effort the people spend while walking. The park, walking path and the corresponding relationship between the environmental movement points are left very weak
- Transportation outside the major meeting places of the park, was made impossible by the transition inside the park. Effort exerted and from roads increased 2-3 times due to park
-When consider 2 dimensional, available and accessible park areas in total park area is a low rate. The trees, sculpture, decorative pool, subway entrances may be given as an example.

IZCI PARK, YUZUNCU YIL, ANKARA

Size and Space for Approach in Use

In the entry of the Izci park, there is an sitting area and stone ground. The concept of this park necessitates a netural view. However, with this entrance, the park makes an influence that atificiality, in he begining. This is a flaw of usage of this park and not appropriate for the aim. This situation is against to the principle of the "Size and Space for Approach in Use".

Flexibility in Use

In the İzci Park, spesific areas are so strict that it does not allow the usage in different ways. There are playing areas for children, strict ways, benches and a meaningless, empty canal in this park. İzci park is not open to imagination of the peoplethus, the design of it does not fit to principle of "Flexibility in use".

Tolerance for Error

There are some rock pieces in the park which are part of the design and they are put on purposely. They are unnecessary and dangerous. This rocks are against the principle "tolerance for error". People might stumble upon these rocks and got injured seriously.

Low Physical Effort

There is a big pool like a canal which is continuing along the park. This canal is made of stones. There is not any bridges or alternative ways over the canal. The canal does not allow people to go wherever they want to. It forces people to find an another way and it is uncomfortable. People have to make extra effort. Thus, in this way, this park is against the principle of "low physical effort".